I think we may have analysed this retro A&J before?

I think we may have analysed this retro A&J before?

Thanks to Targuman for sending this in, with illuminating comment.

That idea, and its expression as “nothing new under the sun”, is most prominent to our contemporary culture from the book which Targuman (and scholars of the Hebrew Bible) refers to as Qohelet (The Teacher), also known to most of us as Ecclesiastes (The Preacher) — famous for collaborating with Pete Seeger on that song. :-)
Though that is the most familiar source, what are the chances it was actually the first? Hard to say, after several thousand years. However, somebody had to be first. And in that very moment they were making it false, since there was now something new: that very thought.
So that gives a fun-paradox! But … is it really a case of hypocrisy?




This next one depends on remembering when Lars von Trier and friends declared the Dogme 95 principles for filmmaking. (And probably does not require remembering the Kevin Smith film Dogma.)


With this December 2011 Brevity, we’re getting a bit into OYs.







And we interrupt our parade of Oldies to drop in a Duffy Lug Nuts on the same theme from current GoComics publication:










Btw, the text means “Happy Birthday”

Some medical conditions are best approached gingerly.



Thanks to Darren for sending this Heart of the City:

Many CIDU readers will recognize the cow tools for what they are, but there are also some who may not — so this is tagged both CIDU and Shoutout.
In this 2009 PC and Pixel, it seems to be Pixel from within his carrier dispensing the wisdom. But what is he agreeing with? That computer customers just want Internet connectivity? Or want no options so they need not make decisions?
And what is grabbing everyone’s attention?

And BTW, how many other cat cartoon protagonists deign to be confined to a carrier?

What could she have heard in place of labor? That would be like a, y’know, joke or punch line?

And by the bye, is “More’s Law”
an accidental typo for “Moore’s Law” ;
an intentional misspelling, meant to direct us to think about some actual person named “More” ;
or an intentional misspelling, meant to direct us to the concept of having more rather than less?
Note that the quote about loneliness and solitude is from poet Marianne Moore. But if that’s what’s meant, it would still be Moore not More. So if it were written here as “More’s Law” there might be a joke that the Girl takes it to mean Marianne Moore rather than the late Gordon Moore.
But we can’t really make that emendation, as we would lose the relevance of “more” to the idea of the biggest milkshake. Which is itself still in need of some explication.

Thanks to Usual John for pointing out this Blondie episode with a mystery. He asks “Is this a reference to someone in Blondie’s flapper past?”
We noticed later that Josh at The Comics Curmudgeon also features this cartoon. But he doesn’t truly answer the mystery, so this independent find doesn’t obviate the usual spirited CIDU discussion.