This seems to work from a double mis-aiming:
This one got a chuckle from Chemgal. While not really a CIDU, it does have me scratching my head to see if I can remember where “There can only be one” could come from. Oh, you say there are multiple sources? No, but there can only …
Thanks to Rob for this Stahler:
And Rob steps right back in with this 1-and-done:
What I mean by “second-order synchronicity” is that Arthur was struck by two different synchro pairs on the same day.
“Barney & Clyde matches with MGG:”
“And Close To Home matches with Off the Mark:”
“Neither are exact matches, but both immediately caught my eye.”
Sent in by Barbara – thanks!
Some viewers report “It took a second!”
A Halloween themed LOL from Todd. Also suggested by Olivier.
From Olivier.
A bad joke about making a bad joke!
An OY and a lol wrapped into one!
A pair of Ewws from Olivier:
Every year when I (Winter Wallaby) go to the Washington state fair, I see a booth selling something like “Cow Chip cookies,” or “Cow Patty cookies,” with a graphic to match. While I assume the cookies themselves taste fine, I always wonder about the marketing decision to have a name and graphic that makes me go “ewww” when I’m considering what food to buy.
On the other hand, every year I see poop emoji hats for sale at the state fair, and I assume they wouldn’t keep putting them out if people didn’t buy them, so what do I know?
Submitted by Andréa
B.A.: Close to Home characters are so ugly, their faces can shatter computer monitors?
Submitted by Charles:
Comics I Don't Understand 