
… for ratio of painstaking art work over contribution to resulting joke value?

… for ratio of painstaking art work over contribution to resulting joke value?

This appeared last Sunday, and while neither Mitch nor I got it at first glance, maybe I do after staring at it a bit more. But it’s still opaque enough to make me want to hear what others think of it.
Tatulli also gets points IMHO for doing a decent job of copying Jim Borgman’s style! It’s always fun when you see one cartoonist do that with another’s characters.
It turns out that this isn’t a CIDU once you see the followup, but Kilby quite rightly flagged the first of the pair:

The sequel is here:
https://resources.arcamax.com/newspics/253/25327/2532765.gif
This is from May, 1963. A year later, Khrushchev will be forced into retirement, so we did find out who would be so much worse to deal with after he was gone. Was he seen to be on the ropes then? Nina was Nikita’s second wife, although they didn’t marry until 1965.
Yes, CIDU discourages political discussions, but the statute of limitations on this one is likely past.
