It’s not really about her is it?

To me this is an undecidable, but it’s not of the “What in the world?” type, but just which of a few basic alternatives. It could be the speaker is right, and the particular paintings in this gallery are setting the kid off. Or the kid is just tired and cranky, and being still walking around anywhere in the museum would set off the tantrum. In which case the speaker is probably just dense and mistaken (and we’re amused at him); or he is attempting a joke of his own.

10 Comments

  1. I enjoy seeing how Bliss has created in miniature format an O’Keeffe flower painting. Is anyone here familiar enough with her work to identify this as based on a particular identifiable model? Or would it be more a matter of capturing a style?

  2. Perhaps it /is/ meant to be somewhat “about her”. The suggestion would be that the child could become distressed by O’Keeffe’s sexualized nature imagery, even while not knowing that’s what’s doing it.

  3. I think it’s just sarcasm. I can imagine this being amusing in a scene from a comedy. Especially if it was said in Steve Martin’s voice.

  4. Gee – I just thought it was a funny cartoon. Maybe some of us are overthinking a bit ?

  5. Ah, Mary McNeil, you touching naïf! When we find it here, we’re obliged to fuss over why it is funny or how it is funny or whether it is truly funny ..

  6. Is it possible to overthink a comic in this forum? It’s kind of what we do.

  7. beckoningchasm: Yes, it IS a scene in a comedy! With Steve Martin. “He hates these cans!

Add a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s