Semi-OT: The New Yorkers

I thought this might interest some of you because of the Peter Arno connection.

We saw this show, by the way, and were impressed by how they stitched it all together to create something comprehensible. Also by how much time and expense they put into something they was only going to run for five days.

And now they’re going to make a recording which… is also going to lose a ton of money.

 

 

OT, but worth noting

Yesterday, I happened to read something Norman Vincent Peale wrote in 1957 for Look magazine, regarding school boards banning books like Huckleberry Finn “because of inappropriate language and ideas” (yes, as far back as 1957).

He referred to “the peculiar notion that all ideas in fiction must be good,” and predicted that in the future “supernervous boards might drop Merchant of Venice or the Bible because some characters are depicted unsympathetically or in a way that some people might find disturbing [we’ve already gone there, of course]. If children’s minds are to be shielded from conflict and social change, it might be better to keep them away from reading entirely.”

Frazz Math

jan28 frazz point and actually his ninth

Okay, if Random-Child-Who-Isn’t-Caulfield is eight, then this is his ninth spring melt-off.

Though actually, based on what Frazz is saying about the first two years of his life, seventh actually is accurate.

Though since Frazz doesn’t mention The Diaper Years to confirm Random-Child-Who-Isn’t-Caulfield’s use of “seventh,” why is he even mentioning it? And what is the alleged point that Random-Child-Who-Isn’t-Caulfield is allegedly ignoring?