
And then, do we think it was intentional, or something went wrong along the way?

And then, do we think it was intentional, or something went wrong along the way?
This Six Chix panel, from the Wednesdays chick, Susan C K, is dated this coming Wednesday, 6 March, but was available by mistake last Wednesday, 28 February, when Comics Kingdom released their revamped website, and among several other issues was noticed to be displaying comics planned for up to a week in the future.

Whut? I suppose there could be a problem with the mechanism so that some dampers cannot stay lifted, making the notes from those strings always staccato. But that’s a stretch, and there isn’t a normal sense in which some strings have staccato as a property.
Thanks to Chipper 42 for sending and commenting on this one.

“Thu, February 29, 2024 Hagar — I have no idea. Helga looks like she is enthusiastically prancing to do the dishes, and what is the checkered cloth about?”
As always — but it needs saying explicitly again now and then — we like to think of this as a reader-participation site, and not just for your invaluable (or anyhow amusing) comments, but for suggestions of comics to run and discuss.
Please share your specific suggestions of panels or strips, in CIDU, LOL, and OY categories, either by direct email to

(that’s “CIDU dot Submissions” at gmail dot com) or by using the handy-dandy Suggest A CIDU form page!
Thanks to Darren for sending this in and commenting —

If it were “Look out. Skydivers”, I’d understand. But that they’re supposed to be BASE jumpers, I don’t get. Does that mean that the angels are down low or that there’s something unseen to jump from up super high? And are the (parachuteless?) wingsuits important?
BillR and his wife do have a theory about this..

“Best the wife and I can come up with is, that’s how granny cut up his sandwiches as a boy.”
Thanks to Rob S. for sending this in (and introducing some of us to the Bacön strip):

Though it has appeared previously: https://cidu.info/tag/bacon-comic/
Thanks to Rob S. for this late-Valentine entry from Penné in the New Yorker!

GoComics is running some vintage “B.C” under the title “Back to B.C.”. This strip is from 1966 and seems to be in sequence with others from that time.

But a previous strip already used up the pun on “fresh” to mean mildly impolite, sassy. So, what is this one getting at? Is “floating upside down” still a sign of “fresh” behavior? Or just avoiding being purchased?
As always — but it needs saying explicitly again now and then — we like to think of this as a reader-participation site, and not just for your invaluable (or anyhow amusing) comments, but for suggestions of comics to run and discuss.
Please share your specific suggestions of panels or strips, in CIDU, LOL, and OY categories, either by direct email to

(that’s “CIDU dot Submissions” at gmail dot com) or by using the handy-dandy Suggest A CIDU form page!
Thanks to Chemgal for sending and discussing this SMBC:

Chemgal and your Editors in consultation fairly quickly pinned down what is going on here. But we didn’t want to put it all out there and deprive you readers from tossing it around yourselves.
Suggestion to early commenters, you might avoid spoiling it for others, and just state that you have it. But those working to piece it together, please go at it.
…
For those who think the extra bits of cartoonist text are an integral part of an SMBC — well no, they aren’t really, but you can have them anyway:
Votey: Now do your mother-handling homework!!
Rollover: OK, if patreon is any indication, many of you are confused but four and a half of you are HOWLING.
Nope, I don’t really get either of these Library Comics 4-panel stories; which arrived together in the same email.




In the above “A”-Strip, I thought it would turn out the thing she was using and thought of as a game would turn out to be an IRL investments app (or “stock market gambling” app, if you prefer). But it turns into a Martin swerve.




And in the “B”-Strip, is this at all about the interaction of library staffers Jody(?) and Stephanie, or are both included just so there can be dialogue about but not including the somewhat problematic “patron”? And what is his story, come to think of it?
As always — but it needs saying explicitly again now and then — we like to think of this as a reader-participation site, and not just for your invaluable (or anyhow amusing) comments, but for suggestions of comics to run and discuss.
Please share your specific suggestions of panels or strips, in CIDU, LOL, and OY categories, either by direct email to

(that’s “CIDU.Submissions” at gmail dot com) or by using the handy-dandy Suggest A CIDU form page!