From Chemgal:

She notes:
“Probably a CIDU for some. It was for me, but, it turns out it was easily Googled.”
Certainly was a CIDU for me!
From Chemgal:

She notes:
“Probably a CIDU for some. It was for me, but, it turns out it was easily Googled.”
Certainly was a CIDU for me!
(Title is an anagram, left as an exercise for the readers)
Leigh Rubin has been on a roll lately, slipping almost-NSFW strips in:



Toomey had one, too

I’m marking these Arlo even though I’d suggest it’s arguable that they don’t need it.
Findus shares

And notes: So the customer looks nothing like the models but is still pleased with the make-up. So what? Or is she buying a distorting mirror? Should I recognise the customer or the person the make-up is evoking?
What is she* taking? And why did a commenter on GoComics make a reference to TinTin? (OK, we have a theory on that one, but is it related to the comic?)
*Based on necklace and shoes; not intended as sexism, though I suppose even making an assumption based on necklace and shoes could be considered sexist. Sue me, I’m 62.
From Boise Ed:

He quite reasonably wonders, “What does Napoleon have to do with bisecting a soccer ball?”

comma, Did we come in?
I thought perhaps the local paper had messed this up but no, it’s the same online. Either there’s a first panel missing or the dialog is just borked.
Mitch suggests, “except that the Nancy artist likes playing meta games and so forth and could be intentionally starting off in medias res…”
What does the braintrust think?

Boise Ed sends the above, noting, “It’s not that IDU what’s happening, but why is it funny that the guy has stiffed the Girl Scout?”
I’d also add that there seems to be a video camera in the background, AND the woman in pink is driving something that looks more like a courtroom typewriter than a laptop–is this a recycled strip? Yet neither Tineye nor Google Images finds it, so maybe not. Perhaps Hoest and Reiner are stuck in the past?

It doesn’t seem like that axe would fit in that crate, does it? The stump and basket, maybe–though after UPS rolls it around the back of the truck several times, I doubt the basket would be in that good condition.
ObAnecdote: I have nothing against UPS, but I worked with a woman who hated them with a passion, and with justification: they lost her bridesmaids’ dresses. All of them. Forever. Never reappeared. I’d hear her in the next cubicle calling a company and trying to find some OTHER way of shipping their item, and cancelling the order if they had no choices except UPS. Still makes me laugh.
P.S. Yes, this post is late. Y’all are all entitled to a full refund of your CIDU membership fees.

This appeared last Sunday, and while neither Mitch nor I got it at first glance, maybe I do after staring at it a bit more. But it’s still opaque enough to make me want to hear what others think of it.
Tatulli also gets points IMHO for doing a decent job of copying Jim Borgman’s style! It’s always fun when you see one cartoonist do that with another’s characters.
It turns out that this isn’t a CIDU once you see the followup, but Kilby quite rightly flagged the first of the pair:

The sequel is here:
https://resources.arcamax.com/newspics/253/25327/2532765.gif
Tim Harrod sent:

Not one clue here