BoiseEd writes: A painter wearing a necktie, painting a canvas that is floating in mid-air in front of its easel-frame. We’ve all seen absurdities of modern art; perhaps this is absurdities of a modern artist?
Related
13 Comments
The canvas is stuck to his paintbrush and he’s trying to shake it off.
I would have thought the agitrons would be a dead give-away. If the canvas were falling, the sphericasia would be vertical lines indicating the downward movement, and if it were ouija-like there would be no need to indicate movement of the arm. Don’t they teach you kids anything in school these days?
guero: Hah! Nicely done. Even still, it’s a CIDU in that I don’t see it as funny, cute, or interesting, I’m afraid. But at least I agree that Powers’ explanation is the only one that seems to make any sense. Especially with those agitrons!
It’s hard to believe (a) that paint could dry quickly enough to stick brush to canvas, and (b) that he could hold it up by the brush. And how did it come off the easel/clamp? And as phsiiicidu said, there’s nothing funny, cute, or interesting about it.
Not funny but Parkinsons? A snapshot in time. The moments before and after would have been disjointed. Like the 911 diver that wasn’t. Like I said, not funny. After that I have no idea. Cardiologist? Seismologist? Table rapping fortune teller? Lie detector?
Comics I Don't Understand 
The canvas is stuck to his paintbrush and he’s trying to shake it off.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now, THAT makes more sense than anything I came up with. The necktie just adds to the absurdity, I guess, or is meant to be a deflection.
LikeLike
Before I saw the earlier explanations, I thought he was doing Ouija painting, where you hold the brush to the canvas and the canvas moves around.
LikeLike
This is a gag for a three panel strip.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My assumption is that the canvas has just fallen off the easel…
LikeLike
My first thought was that this was a new art form where you painted the canvas as it was falling, but I’m sure Powers has it.
LikeLike
I would have thought the agitrons would be a dead give-away. If the canvas were falling, the sphericasia would be vertical lines indicating the downward movement, and if it were ouija-like there would be no need to indicate movement of the arm. Don’t they teach you kids anything in school these days?
LikeLiked by 1 person
guero: Hah! Nicely done. Even still, it’s a CIDU in that I don’t see it as funny, cute, or interesting, I’m afraid. But at least I agree that Powers’ explanation is the only one that seems to make any sense. Especially with those agitrons!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s hard to believe (a) that paint could dry quickly enough to stick brush to canvas, and (b) that he could hold it up by the brush. And how did it come off the easel/clamp? And as phsiiicidu said, there’s nothing funny, cute, or interesting about it.
LikeLike
Anyone who has ever watched Bob Ross knows how important it is to clean paint brushes often.
LikeLike
And beat the devil out them.
LikeLike
Not funny but Parkinsons? A snapshot in time. The moments before and after would have been disjointed. Like the 911 diver that wasn’t. Like I said, not funny. After that I have no idea. Cardiologist? Seismologist? Table rapping fortune teller? Lie detector?
LikeLike
He’s painting the earthquake fissure that has opened on the ground in front of him.
LikeLike