Logical Impossibilities

I have been following Leigh Rubin’s “Rubes” comics for at least a decade, or possibly two. I have to admit that it only rarely provokes an audible laugh, but it is virtually always worth a good smile. It is precisely this dependability that makes it all the more noticeable when a “Rubes” comic just doesn’t work, such as this one:


Simply telescoping two concepts into one term doesn’t always produce a meaningful (nor humorous) result. The whole point of the “Schrödinger’s Cat” thought experiment is “observability”. In this drawing we can see both the cat and the damage, so there cannot be any quantum (or “cat-tum”) superposition.


I had even more trouble with this second comic, which I would like to call “Stooge Trek“:


Nobody would ever claim that anything that The Three Stooges ever did was “logical”, but Spock’s reaction (and dialog) seems completely out of place (even more illogical than the picture he is watching). For me, this comic just doesn’t work; YMMV.

P.S. Given the similarity of the hair styles of Moe and Spock, perhaps it would have been funnier to have a second frame, in which Spock pokes Kirk in the eyes.


P.P.S. I initially thought that the “dual nose poke” tableau seemed gratuitously excessive, but I was clearly wrong, as proved by this picture:


B.A.: “Three for Bill not to understand”

3cats

“Just kidding. What I did see here was three acceptable jokes (what the cat said, what the @#$% Squirrel said, and the sign) competing for the punchline. And sort of messing things up. That’s my opinion, anyway. ”

Bill: 1) Andréa also submitted this as an LOL (for the name on the sign)
2) I can’t believe this was the first “Schrödinger’s Cat” comic since the Comicalypse
3) Personal note to Andréa: All responses I send to either of the e-mail addresses you sent me are bouncing back.