He’s out with the commercial sign spinners, but he’s just advertising himself.
I think the “or both” is a secondary joke, but it’s odd enough to catch your brain. My main problem with it is that “both” seems to imply hiring him as a gigolo.
Arthur: Or he’s willing to put out for a job. #DougToo #TooSoon #ThatsNotFunny
I think it’s more noteworthy when you actually understand an F minus.
Having a math background, the tickler in the joke is making the distinction for Xor (exclusive or [A or B but not (A and B)] as compared to Or [A or B or (A and B)]
Doug is flexible, he’s cool with both options. For me, I’m guessing that Doug is also ok if each option is from a different person. Doug is just that kind of guy.
Doug is self-employed as a sign-spinner. And as a dating app. (Neither of which make much sense.)
He’s also self-employed as one of those guys who leaves reviews.
He’s out with the commercial sign spinners, but he’s just advertising himself.
I think the “or both” is a secondary joke, but it’s odd enough to catch your brain. My main problem with it is that “both” seems to imply hiring him as a gigolo.
Just slightly misses the “Why not both?” meme.
Just remember what Gary Larson said: “Beware of Doug!“:
Arthur: Or he’s willing to put out for a job. #DougToo #TooSoon #ThatsNotFunny
I think it’s more noteworthy when you actually understand an F minus.
Having a math background, the tickler in the joke is making the distinction for Xor (exclusive or [A or B but not (A and B)] as compared to Or [A or B or (A and B)]
Doug is flexible, he’s cool with both options. For me, I’m guessing that Doug is also ok if each option is from a different person. Doug is just that kind of guy.
Doug is self-employed as a sign-spinner. And as a dating app. (Neither of which make much sense.)
He’s also self-employed as one of those guys who leaves reviews.
What a catch!