The only problem with the end of the year rush to clean out the dusty comic cabinets is that the posts appear so fast that some of them don’t get the attention they deserve. For instance, this panel was quite good, and I don’t think it was a repeat, either.
“The only problem with the end of the year rush to clean out the dusty comic cabinets is that the posts appear so fast that some of them don’t get the attention they deserve. ”
True, Kilby: but if not now, then when?
Hopefully, after the holidays when the site returns to normal, some of you will have a chance to look at the late-December posts at your leisure.
when the site returns to normal
That’s a disconcerting thought.
Anyone familiar with spycraft as a general topic would be loathe to involve a double agent. They’re notoriously unreliable.
Rest assured, Brian, I ONLY meant in terms of posting frequency.
@ Bill – I simply figured that adding a comment would get this thread back onto the list of the 15 most recent comments, which would help it get the attention it deserves.
Is a double agent any less reliable than any other kind of literary agent?
An agent works for you, or works for someone. A double-agent either works for you and pretends to work for someone else, or works for someone else and pretends to work for you. Which do you want?
Comics I Don't Understand 
The only problem with the end of the year rush to clean out the dusty comic cabinets is that the posts appear so fast that some of them don’t get the attention they deserve. For instance, this panel was quite good, and I don’t think it was a repeat, either.
“The only problem with the end of the year rush to clean out the dusty comic cabinets is that the posts appear so fast that some of them don’t get the attention they deserve. ”
True, Kilby: but if not now, then when?
Hopefully, after the holidays when the site returns to normal, some of you will have a chance to look at the late-December posts at your leisure.
when the site returns to normal
That’s a disconcerting thought.
Anyone familiar with spycraft as a general topic would be loathe to involve a double agent. They’re notoriously unreliable.
Rest assured, Brian, I ONLY meant in terms of posting frequency.
@ Bill – I simply figured that adding a comment would get this thread back onto the list of the 15 most recent comments, which would help it get the attention it deserves.
Is a double agent any less reliable than any other kind of literary agent?
An agent works for you, or works for someone. A double-agent either works for you and pretends to work for someone else, or works for someone else and pretends to work for you. Which do you want?